• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 11 (2025)
Volume Volume 10 (2024)
Volume Volume 9 (2023)
Volume Volume 8 (2022)
Volume Volume 7 (2021)
Volume Volume 6 (2020)
Volume Volume 5 (2019)
Volume Volume 4 (2018)
Volume Volume 3 (2017)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2016)
Volume Volume 1 (2015)
Ali, .. (2017). CALL: The Need for Evaluation Paradigms. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 3(2), 69-90. doi: 10.21608/jrciet.2017.24462
. Abdellatif Elshazli Ali. "CALL: The Need for Evaluation Paradigms". Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 3, 2, 2017, 69-90. doi: 10.21608/jrciet.2017.24462
Ali, .. (2017). 'CALL: The Need for Evaluation Paradigms', Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 3(2), pp. 69-90. doi: 10.21608/jrciet.2017.24462
Ali, .. CALL: The Need for Evaluation Paradigms. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology, 2017; 3(2): 69-90. doi: 10.21608/jrciet.2017.24462

CALL: The Need for Evaluation Paradigms

Article 3, Volume 3, Issue 2, April 2017, Page 69-90  XML PDF (611.57 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/jrciet.2017.24462
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
. Abdellatif Elshazli Ali
Faculty of Education, Benha University
Abstract
T





he evaluation of CALL from the perspective of gross comparisons of CALL versus classroom learning outcomes is an approach unlikely to shed light on the problem or solution of instructed SLA. It creates an irony wherein the most sophisticated modern tool is investigated through the most crude and outdated educational research methods (Chapell 2005)This paper reviews current methods of evaluation of CALL as an instructional solution to the problem of instructed SLA, on the basis of theory of conditions (cognitive and socio-affective) that ideally should be created for optimal/successful learning environments and effective task-based instruction.Evaluation of CALL task cannot be a categorical decision about effectiveness. Instead, it results in an argument indicating in what ways a particular task is appropriate for particular learners at a given time, i.e., CALL task appropriateness. CALL task evaluation denotes three levels of analysis: CALL software, teacher-planned activity, and learners' performance during activities. Evaluation argument is constructed on the basis of both judgemental and empirical analyses. The former examines characteristics of the software and t/task while the latter addresses the details of CALL taskuse and learning outcomes in terms of principles /criteria drawn from theory and research on conditions for instructed SLA. The criteria for CALL appropriateness are applied in view of the stated purpose of a CALL task at various stages of instruction.    Examples of CALL task evaluation, a judgemental as well as an empirical research tasks/activities, are provided. 
Keywords
Evaluation Paradigms
Statistics
Article View: 170
PDF Download: 434
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.